Ananias, the high priest, presided over Paul's trial and ordered him to be struck on the mouth for his defense.
the high priest who ordered Paul struck (ACT 23:2)
-
en
Ananias
or Ananiah, the cloud of the Lord
- en High Priest · Also called
-
en
Ananias
· Also called · H2608 G367 · ACT 23:2 y-h-v-h is gracious
-
he
חֲנַנְיָה
chananəyah · H2608 · ACT 23:2 y-h-v-h is gracious
- el Ἁνανίας A̔nanías · G367 · ACT 23:2
- el Ἀνανίας · G0367I
- bg Анания
SDA Books
Awaiting permission to publishLoading book references…
- Paul goes before the Council · c. AD 54
- Paul sent to Felix · c. AD 56 – AD 58
Ananias was the high priest during the time of Paul's trial in Jerusalem. When Paul was brought before the Sanhedrin to face accusations from the Jewish leaders, Ananias presided over the proceedings. During Paul's defense, Ananias ordered those standing near Paul to strike him on the mouth. Paul, unaware that Ananias was the high priest, rebuked him for commanding him to be struck contrary to the law. Later, when Paul was brought before Felix the governor, Ananias, along with some elders and an orator named Tertullus, presented their case against Paul, accusing him of being a troublemaker and a ringleader of the Nazarene sect.
The high priest before whom Paul was brought in the procuratorship of Felix (Acts 23:2, 5, 24). He was so enraged at Paul’s noble declaration, “I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day,” that he commanded one of his attendants to smite him on the mouth. Smarting under this unprovoked insult, Paul quickly replied, “God shall smite thee, thou whited wall.” Being reminded that Ananias was the high priest, to whose office all respect was to be paid, he answered, “I wist not, brethren, that he was the high priest” (Acts 23:5). This expression has occasioned some difficulty, as it is scarcely probable that Paul should have been ignorant of so public a fact. The expression may mean (a) that Paul had at the moment overlooked the honour due to the high priest; or (b), as others think, that Paul spoke ironically, as if he had said, “The high priest breaking the law! God’s high priest a tyrant and a lawbreaker! I see a man in white robes, and have heard his voice, but surely it cannot, it ought not to be, the voice of the high priest.” (See Dr. Lindsay on Acts, in loco.) (c) Others think that from defect of sight Paul could not observe that the speaker was the high priest. In all this, however, it may be explained, Paul, with all his excellency, comes short of the example of his divine Master, who, when he was reviled, reviled not again.
Sources: BibleData (CC BY 4.0, Ananias_3) · STEPBible TIPNR (CC BY 4.0, Ananias@Act.23.2-) · Theographic Bible Metadata (CC BY-SA 4.0, ananias_260)